Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Premium2. Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S Lowcost
Comparison: Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Fortuna) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook allround tyres are slightly better rated (82%) than Fortuna (0%). The first tyre test of Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S was done in 2025, compared to 2021 when was the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 215/50 R18 test, where both the Eco Plus 2 4S and the Kinergy 4S2 X H750A were tested.
| # | Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R18 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 4.2 | 1– | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | ||
| Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S Rating: Not recommended | 4.2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | ||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Rating: Good | 2.2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
