Segment
1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Upper-middle2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle
Comparison: Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Firestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (50%) than Yokohama (43%). In this particular case, the Firestone Winterhawk 4 has a better rating of 69% compared to 52% of the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905. The first tyre test of Firestone Winterhawk 4 was done in 2020, compared to 2018 when was the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Firestone Winterhawk 4 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 has C rating. We also know where Winterhawk 4 is made - Italy.
| # | Firestone Winterhawk 4 | Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Highly recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Satisfactory