• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01

Tire choice has a significant impact on vehicle performance and safety. On our tyre test site, we compare different tyres to help you make an informed decision. In this review, we'll look at the Firestone Roadhawk and the Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01.


The Firestone Roadhawk, a summer tyre, received a rating of 59% on our site. You can view more about its performance on the Firestone manufacturer’s page. The tyre’s strengths lie in its fuel efficiency, though it displayed weaknesses when tested on dry roads and in rainy conditions, resulting in increased wear. In the ADAC test, the Firestone Roadhawk held the last position out of 17 tyres. Even more concerning was its 30th position out of 51 in the Autobild test. Therefore, while it offers some advantages, it has significant room for improvement, particularly in dry and wet conditions.


Turning to the Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01, this tyre received a rating of 52% on our site. More about its performance is available on the Laufenn manufacturer's page. In mutual tests, it consistently outperformed the Firestone Roadhawk. Ranking 14th in the ADAC test, it demonstrated superiority in comparison with the Firestone Roadhawk. In the Autobild test as well, the Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 performed better than the Firestone Roadhawk, holding the 21st position out of 51 tested tyres.


In conclusion, although the Firestone Roadhawk and Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 have similar ratings, the latter tyre is stronger in both dry and wet conditions according to the test results. While the Firestone Roadhawk boasts lower fuel consumption, it falls short in other essential aspects such as resistance to wear and performance on dry roads. On the other hand, the Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 secures a better position in both the ADAC and Autobild tests, thus proving to be a more reliable choice overall.


If you're looking for a tyre with the most comprehensive performance profile, the Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 might be the better bet. However, keep in mind that tyre performance can vary based on the specific conditions and vehicle type. Make sure to consider these factors when choosing your tyres.

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Firestone Roadhawk
51%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
59%
Laufenn
S Fit EQ+ LK01
Wet Braking
Firestone Roadhawk
53%
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
69%
Wet Handling
Firestone Roadhawk
18%
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
33%
Best: Falken Azenis FK510 (96.0%)
Wet Circle Cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
78%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
61%
Best: Kumho Ecsta PS71 (94.0%)
Aquaplaning Cross
Firestone Roadhawk
54%
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
54%
Best: Kumho Ecsta PS71 (94.0%)
Best in category: Kumho Ecsta PS71 (83.8%)
Dry Performance
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
88%
Laufenn
S Fit EQ+ LK01
Dry Braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
88%
Best in category: Bridgestone Turanza T005 (94.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
74%
Laufenn
S Fit EQ+ LK01
Noise Exterior
Firestone Roadhawk
63%
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
66%
Best: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 (81.0%)
Noise Interior
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
82%
Best: Falken Azenis FK510 (89.0%)
Best in category: Sava Intensa UHP 2 (79.5%)
Economy
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
76%
Laufenn
S Fit EQ+ LK01
Fuel Efficiency
Firestone Roadhawk
84%
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
80%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
72%
Best: Michelin Primacy 4 (94.0%)
Best in category: Michelin Primacy 4 (89.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison