Segment
1. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle2. Kormoran Road Performance Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (54%) than Kormoran (15%). In this particular case, the Firestone Roadhawk has a better rating of 72% compared to 15% of the Kormoran Road Performance. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Roadhawk and the Road Performance were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 96% of Firestone Roadhawk has A wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Kormoran Road Performance has C rating.
# | Firestone Roadhawk | Kormoran Road Performance | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R15 - R16 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle2. Kormoran Road Performance Lowcost
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Kormoran Road Performance Sufficient
1. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended2. Kormoran Road Performance Sufficient
1. Firestone Roadhawk 71 dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,2 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 2,3 | ||
Kormoran Road Performance Rating: Sufficient | 3,7 | 3,5 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 1,2 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
Firestone Roadhawk | 35,2 | 36,5 | |||||
Kormoran Road Performance | 38,2 | 43,5 | |||||
Show test details |