Segment
1. Firestone Multiseason Upper-middle2. Fulda MultiControl Lowcost
Comparison: Firestone Multiseason vs. Fulda MultiControl
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Generally, Fulda allround tyres are slightly better rated (4%) than Firestone (0%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Multiseason and the MultiControl were tested.
| # | Firestone Multiseason
| Fulda MultiControl
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Fulda MultiControl 23.78
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda MultiControl Recommended2. Firestone Multiseason Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda MultiControl Recommended2. Firestone Multiseason Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,4 | 45,2 | |||||
| Firestone Multiseason | 47,1 | 55,9 | |||||
| Fulda MultiControl | 45,3 | 52,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
