Segment
1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Falken winter tyres are slightly better rated (44%) than Kumho (38%). The first tyre test of Falken EuroWinter HS01 was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 225/40 R18 test, where both the EuroWinter HS01 and the WinterCraft WP71 were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where EuroWinter HS01 is made - Turkey.
# | Falken EuroWinter HS01
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R13 - R21 | R16 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle
1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2 | 1- | |||
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good | dobré | 2+ | 2- | 1- | |||
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 2+ | 2- | 3 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
Falken EuroWinter HS01 | 37 | 27 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | 35,7 | 28 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
Falken EuroWinter HS01 | 33,9 | 26,1 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | 31,5 | 24,8 | |||||
Show test details |