Segment
1. Dunlop Sport BluResponse Premium2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Dunlop) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Dunlop is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Dunlop summer tyres are slightly better rated (72%) than Kumho (60%). In this particular case, the Dunlop Sport BluResponse has a better rating of 71% compared to 56% of the Kumho Ecowing ES31. The first tyre test of Dunlop Sport BluResponse was done in 2015, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecowing ES31 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Sport BluResponse and the Ecowing ES31 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 74% of Dunlop Sport BluResponse has A wet grip rating, whereas 76% of Kumho Ecowing ES31 has B rating.
# | Dunlop Sport BluResponse
| Kumho Ecowing ES31
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R13 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Dunlop Sport BluResponse Premium2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle
1. Dunlop Sport BluResponse Exemplary2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | |
Dunlop Sport BluResponse Rating: Good | dobré | 2,3 | 2,1 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 2,1 | |
Kumho Ecowing ES31 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | |
Show test details |