In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from USA. Dunlop is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Dunlop winter tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than BFGoodrich (75%). The first tyre test of Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 185/65 R15 test, where both the SP Winter Response 2 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 90% of Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 also have B wet ratings.
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Averaged from 2 tests
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.