Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium3. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle4. Debica Presto UHP Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto UHP vs. Nokian Powerproof vs. Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Exemplary2. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary3. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended3. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Debica Presto UHP | 36,1 | 32,8 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 32,9 | 29,1 | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 | 33,5 | 28,7 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti | 33,4 | 31,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
