Segment
1. Debica Presto HP2 Lowcost2. Petlas Imperium PT515 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto HP2 vs. Petlas Imperium PT515
Table of contents:
| # | Debica Presto HP2
| Petlas Imperium PT515
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R15 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Today's comparison will cover two models of summer tyres, the Debica Presto HP2 and the Petlas Imperium PT515. Both of them have their own strengths and weaknesses which we will discuss. Our goal is to understand which tyre provides the best performance based on our examination and various tests.
The Debica Presto HP2 tyres have an overall rating of 79% based on our analysis. They were ranked 16th in Autobild's test of 53 models and 15th in ADAC's test of 50. Strengths include their high environmental compatibility and good tyre tread life. However, they show some weaknesses when it comes to driving safety and balance.
The Petlas Imperium PT515, manufactured in Turkey, achieved a lower overall rating of 48%. In comparison tests, it landed in 35th place out of 53 in Autobild's and 30th out of 50 in ADAC's. Its advantages include high mileage and reduced tyre wear. However, it struggles with handling on both wet and dry roads, weight, and sustainability issues.
The fact that the Debica Presto HP2 consistently outperformed the Petlas Imperium PT515 in tests suggests that it's the superior tyre overall. The Debica Presto HP2 offers excellent value for the price, thanks to its decent performance, good tyre wear, and reduced environmental impact. However, it falls slightly short in terms of driving safety and balance.
On the other hand, if high mileage and reduced tyre wear are your top priorities, then the Petlas Imperium PT515 might serve you well. However, be prepared for the tyre's poor performance on wet and dry roads, its weight, and sustainability issues.
Neither of these two tyres has been replaced by a newer model. Visit the manufacturer's pages for more information on the Debica Presto HP2 and the Petlas Imperium PT515.
While the final decision depends on your specific needs and priorities, based on our tests and comparisons, we'd recommend the Debica Presto HP2 over the Petlas Imperium PT515 for most drivers.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Debica Presto HP2 12.8
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Presto HP2 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Petlas Imperium PT515 Satisfactory2. Debica Presto HP2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Debica Presto HP2 70 dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Debica Presto HP2 | 37,4 | 30,2 | |||||
| Petlas Imperium PT515 | 39,0 | 31,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | ||||||
| Debica Presto HP2 Rating: Good | 2,3 | ||||||
| Petlas Imperium PT515 Rating: Good | 2,8 | 3,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Debica Presto HP2 | 36,3 | 31,9 | |||||
| Petlas Imperium PT515 | 38,3 | 35,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
