Segment
1. CST Medallion MD-A1 Lowcost2. Kenda KR41 Emera A1 Lowcost
Comparison: CST Medallion MD-A1 vs. Kenda KR41 Emera A1
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (CST) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Kenda). But when it comes to comparing CST Medallion MD-A1 and Kenda KR41 Emera A1, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Medallion MD-A1 and the KR41 Emera A1 were tested.
| # | CST Medallion MD-A1
| Kenda KR41 Emera A1
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kenda KR41 Emera A1 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kenda KR41 Emera A1 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| CST Medallion MD-A1 | 38,1 | 34,8 | |||||
| Kenda KR41 Emera A1 | 34,9 | 30,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
