Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium2. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Nankang). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Nankang (0%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Turanza T001 and Nankang Sportnex AS-2+, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Turanza T001 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Turanza T001 and the Sportnex AS-2+ were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Bridgestone Turanza T001
| Nankang Sportnex AS-2+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium2. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Lowcost
2. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Sufficient
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Satisfactory2. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 | 36,2 | 34,6 | |||||
| Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ | 36,7 | 40,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Comfort | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 100 | 101,1 | 130,3 | 102,4 | 100 | |
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Rating: Satisfactory | 93,5 | 90,2 | 96,9 | 104,5 | 99,3 | 86,7 | |
| Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Rating: Sufficient | 88,7 | 85,6 | 91,8 | 88,7 | 100,4 | 80,0 | |
| Show test details | |||||||