Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Yokohama (46%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the BluEarth winter V905 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 79% of Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 has C rating. We also know where Blizzak LM-005 is made - Italy/Hungary/Poland.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R13 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 30,3 | 24,5 | |||||
| Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 29,2 | 24,6 | |||||
| Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 | 32,5 | 26 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||