18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 vs. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 /0%	Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R22	R15 - R22	R15 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Premium

3. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Premium

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 124

3. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 100

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 15x

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 9x

Best position in test

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 5.

Worst position in test

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 5.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 20.

Average position in tests

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 2.67

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 7.44

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 2019

3. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 2018

Best rating in test

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Highly recommended

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Recommended

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Still recommended

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

Snow

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

90%

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

86%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Snow braking

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 82%

Snow traction

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 91%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 88%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

Snow handling

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 94%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 85%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 72%

Snow cornering

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 86%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 87%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

Lateral guidance on snow

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 76%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 0%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 0%

Snow acceleration

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 94%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 0%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 0%

Snow performance

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 92%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 74%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

83%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Goodyear
UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

81%

Dry braking

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 83%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 75%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 86%

3. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 80%

Dry lane changing

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 80%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

3. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 0%

Dry steering response

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

3. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 0%

Dry driving behavior

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 80%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 78%

Dry performance

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 86%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 80%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

91%

Goodyear
UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

81%

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

73%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 79%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 76%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 81%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 73%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 82%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 79%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 65%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 78%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 75%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 B

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 C

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

Goodyear
UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

80%

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

75%

Exterior noise

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 82%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 79%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

Comfort

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 0%

3. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 0%

Interior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 71%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 56%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 70 dB

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

84%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

75%

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

68%

Rolling resistance

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 65%

Mileage

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 73%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 64%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

Price/value

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 0%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 0%

Fuel efficiency

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 94%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 74%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

85%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

80%

Ice braking

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 85%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

Ice lateral guidance

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 85%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 78%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Automotorsport Winter tyre test 2019 215/55 R17

Name	Points total
Best values in test	8,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good	8,8
Hankook Winter icept evo2 W320 Rating: Good*	7,6
Show test details

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 vs. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands