Segment
2. Dunlop Winter Premium
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO vs. Dunlop Winter
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Dunlop). Dunlop is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Dunlop winter tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Bridgestone (87%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO was done in 2018, compared to 2025 when was the Dunlop Winter first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO has B wet grip rating, whereas 74% of Dunlop Winter has C rating.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
| Dunlop Winter
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Dunlop Winter 1.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Dunlop Winter Exemplary2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Still recommended
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Dunlop Winter 73%
Dry handling
2. Dunlop Winter 64%
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
2. Dunlop Winter 73%
Wet braking
2. Dunlop Winter 84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Dunlop Winter 71%
Wet circle cornering
2. Dunlop Winter 63%
Wet handling
2. Dunlop Winter 67%
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
1. Dunlop Winter 96%
Snow braking
1. Dunlop Winter 87%
Snow cornering
1. Dunlop Winter 96%
Snow handling
1. Dunlop Winter 79%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
1. Dunlop Winter 87%
Rolling resistance
2. Dunlop Winter 81%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Dunlop Winter 87%
Comfort
1. Dunlop Winter 87%
