• 18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Pirelli (71%). The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 225/40 R18 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the Winter Sottozero 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (60%) of the Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made in Romania/Poland and Winter Sottozero 3 is made in Italy.

Mutual tests overview

Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results

Tests used in comparison (3)

Organization Season Year Dimension Action
Autobild Autobild
Winter
2020 225/40 R18 View
Autobild Autobild
Winter
2020 245/45 R18 View
Autobild Autobild
Winter
2019 225/45 R17 View

Performance comparison

Averaged from 3 tests

Wet Performance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
68%
Pirelli
Winter Sottozero 3
Wet Braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
73%
Wet Handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
62%
Wet Circle Cornering
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
65%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
71%
Aquaplaning Cross
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
67%
Best in category: Continental WinterContact TS 860 (89.4%)
Dry Performance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
76%
Pirelli
Winter Sottozero 3
Dry Braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
79%
Dry Handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
66%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
72%
Best in category: Continental WinterContact TS 860 (91.0%)
Snow Performance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
70%
Pirelli
Winter Sottozero 3
Snow Braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
71%
Best: Sava Eskimo HP2 (97.0%)
Snow Traction
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
65%
Snow Handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
70%
Snow Circle Cornering
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
72%
Best in category: Debica Frigo HP2 (93.3%)
Comfort & Noise
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
70%
Pirelli
Winter Sottozero 3
Noise Exterior
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
88%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
72%
Ride Comfort
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
68%
Best: Michelin Alpin 6 (95.0%)
Best in category: Michelin Alpin 6 (89.5%)
Economy
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
82%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
75%
Pirelli
Winter Sottozero 3
Rolling Resistance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
83%
Best: Nokian WR Snowproof (97.0%)
Mileage
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
82%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
67%
Best in category: Michelin Alpin 6 (90.5%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison