18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Hankook Ventus Prime 4 /72%	Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 /0%	Falken EuroWinter HS01 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R13 - R23	R13 - R23	R13 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 533

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 530

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 359

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 23x

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 12x

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 4x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2.

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 5.

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 11.

Worst position in test

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 9.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 21.

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 30.

Average position in tests

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 5.75

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 11.04

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 16.75

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2025

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 2022

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 2020

Best rating in test

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient

Dry

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

75%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

74%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

70%

Dry braking

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 88%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 83%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

Dry handling

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 87%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 79%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 76%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Dry lane changing

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 63%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Dry steering response

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 67%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Dry performance

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 69%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 62%

Dry driving behavior

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 67%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 64%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

79%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

76%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

74%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 79%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 72%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 59%

Wet braking

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 84%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 76%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Wet handling

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 79%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 77%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 89%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 80%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 71%

Wet circle cornering

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 80%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 79%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 68%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Wet performance

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 94%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 79%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 75%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 A

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 B

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

94%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

70%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

70%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

?

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 68%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 68%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 80%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 71%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 71%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 68%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 71%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Snow performance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 67%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

77%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

71%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 80%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 75%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

Comfort

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 74%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 72%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 0%

Interior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 79%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 73%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 67%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 72 dB

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 ?

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

79%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

79%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

69%

Rolling resistance

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 79%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 78%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 47%

Mileage

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 73%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 70%

Price/value

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 90%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 76%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Fuel efficiency

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 86%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 80%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 C

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 D

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

81%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

77%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

?

Ice braking

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 83%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 80%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Ice lateral guidance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 78%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 73%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands