12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Barum Polaris 5 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Barum Polaris 5 /63%	Sava Eskimo HP2 /58%	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%	Matador MP92 Sibir Snow /0%

Dimensions	R13 - R19	R15 - R18	R13 - R19	R15 - R18
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

2. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

2. Barum Polaris 5 76

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 25

Number of tests

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 15x

3. Barum Polaris 5 13x

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

Best position in test

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 6.

3. Barum Polaris 5 9.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

Worst position in test

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 23.

3. Barum Polaris 5 26.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

Average position in tests

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

2. Barum Polaris 5 15.15

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.47

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

Year of the last test

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 2025

2. Barum Polaris 5 2023

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

Best rating in test

1. Barum Polaris 5 Good

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

4. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

72.1%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

70%

Barum
Polaris 5

61%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

54%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

2. Barum Polaris 5 C

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

75.4%

Barum
Polaris 5

63%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

63%

Snow

(Overall rating)

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

78.3%

Barum
Polaris 5

75%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

69%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

57%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Sava
Eskimo HP2

75%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

68.2%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

66%

Barum
Polaris 5

65%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 ?

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

4. Barum Polaris 5 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 5

87%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

79%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

78.1%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

76%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

2. Barum Polaris 5 E

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Sava
Eskimo HP2

85.2%

Barum
Polaris 5

82%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

79.3%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75.2%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 6 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34.6	28.9
Barum Polaris 5	37.7	30.0
Sava Eskimo HP2	39.5	29.6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Barum Polaris 5	37,5	26,9
Sava Eskimo HP2	37,6	26,1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3+	2+	1-	2+
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3	2-	2	2	2+
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	3+	2	2+
Show test details