Segment
1. Falken Linam VAN01 Upper-middle2. Apollo Altrust Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Altrust vs. Falken Linam VAN01
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Apollo (29%). But when it comes to comparing Apollo Altrust and Falken Linam VAN01, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the Altrust and the Linam VAN01 were tested.
| # | Apollo Altrust
| Falken Linam VAN01
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Altrust Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Altrust Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Linam VAN01 72 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Apollo Altrust Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,4 | ||
| Falken Linam VAN01 Rating: Poor | 4,6 | 2,8 | 3,2 | 0,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
