18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
5
49
4
14
Best position
#7
#1
#2
#1
Average position
13.0
3.2
3.3
3.6
Latest test
2022
2024
2026
2025
Available sizes
680
213
40
194

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Wet performance
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Dry
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Dry driving behavior
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Dry lane changing
Continental EcoContact 6
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Dry performance
Continental EcoContact 6
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Interior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Costs
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Fuel efficiency
Continental EcoContact 6
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Price/value
Continental EcoContact 6
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store