12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP71 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Kumho (63%). The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP71 was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 225/40 R18 test, where both the WinterCraft WP71 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho WinterCraft WP71 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has B rating.

#	Kumho WinterCraft WP71 /0%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%

Dimensions	R16 - R19	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 57

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 11x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 6.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 28.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 12.55

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 2020

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71

82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

74%

Wet braking

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 66%

Wet circle cornering

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 77%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Wet handling

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 72%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 70%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 86%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 88%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 C

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

92%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71

65%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 94%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 77%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 88%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 62%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 59%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 95%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 64%

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71

63%

Rolling resistance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 53%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 D

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Dry

(Overall rating)

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71

75%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70%

Dry handling

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 66%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Dry braking

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 84%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 74%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

84%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71

68%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 87%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 70%

Comfort

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 67%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	1-	2	1-
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Conditionally recommended	2+	2-	3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Conditionally recommended	2+	3+	2	3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-	2
Show test details