18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
10
24
4
3
1
Best position
#2
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
2.7
3.3
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
109
302
40
36
66

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Interior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison