18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
10
24
4
14
3
Best position
#2
#1
#2
#1
#2
Average position
6.0
2.7
3.3
3.6
3.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
109
302
40
194
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Interior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store