Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE320 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Ecsta HS52

ZIEX ZE320

Efficientgrip Performance 2

P ZERO PZ4

Number of tests

10

6

4

14

Best position

#2

#3

#2

Average position

6.0

6.2

3.3

5.5

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

109

52

40

700

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

94%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

63%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

74%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

80%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

82%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

59%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

49%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Falken ZIEX ZE320 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Falken ZIEX ZE320 vs Michelin Primacy 4+

Falken ZIEX ZE320 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Falken ZIEX ZE320 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Browse by brand

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE320 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Ecsta HS52

ZIEX ZE320

Efficientgrip Performance 2

P ZERO PZ4

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison