18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE320

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (72%) than Kumho (59%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has a better rating of 74% compared to 72% of the Falken ZIEX ZE320. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta HS52 was done in 2022, compared to 2025 when was the Falken ZIEX ZE320 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2026 225/50 R17 test, where both the Ecsta HS52 and the ZIEX ZE320 were tested.

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
ZIEX ZE320
Number of tests
10
6
Best position
#2
#3
Average position
6.0
6.2
Latest test
2026
2026
Available sizes
109
52

Performance spider chart

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2026225/50 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store