18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
10
49
4
2
3
Best position
#2
#1
#2
#1
#2
Average position
6.0
3.2
3.3
2.0
3.7
Latest test
2026
2024
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
109
213
40
48
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Interior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store