18 shops · 56 ·847+ products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

8.2
R14 – R22
Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

9.0
R15 – R22
Also compare with
PILOT ALPIN 5 UltraContact NXT WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Number of tests
10
49
14
4
23
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
3.2
3.6
3.3
3.3
Latest test
2026
2024
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
109
213
194
40
176

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Wet performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Interior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Dry performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVsBest dry-handling tyresBest rain tyresBest handling tyresQuietest tyresMost economical tyresBest anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6
VS
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Also compare

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian WetproofBridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 PBridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Semperit Speed-Grip 5GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Browse by brand

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store