18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Imperial SnowDragon UHP vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 (2026)

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Imperial (11%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 87% compared to 17% of the Imperial SnowDragon UHP. The first tyre test of Imperial SnowDragon UHP was done in 2020, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the SnowDragon UHP and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below.

Test Profile

Imperial
SnowDragon UHP
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Number of tests
6
49
Best position
#9
#1
Average position
24.7
3.2
Latest test
2025
2024
Available sizes
68
245

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Confidence
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
53%
Imperial
SnowDragon UHP
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Wet Braking
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
53%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
Wet Handling
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
45%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Wet Circle Cornering
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
Aquaplaning Cross
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
22%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Dry Performance
Confidence
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
81%
Imperial
SnowDragon UHP
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Dry Braking
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Dry Handling
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Snow Performance
Confidence
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
58%
Imperial
SnowDragon UHP
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Snow Braking
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Snow Traction
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Snow Handling
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Ice Performance
Confidence
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
78%
Imperial
SnowDragon UHP
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
71%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Ice Braking Abs
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
71%
Comfort & Noise
Confidence
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
81%
Imperial
SnowDragon UHP
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Noise Exterior
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Ride Comfort
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Economy
Confidence
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
62%
Imperial
SnowDragon UHP
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Rolling Resistance
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
62%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%

Performance spider chart

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Winter
2022185/65 R15View
Autoklub ČRAutoklub ČR
Winter
2020205/55 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.