18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE320 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
ZIEX ZE320
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
4
6
5
Best position
#2
#3
#1
Average position
3.3
6.2
2.8
Latest test
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
40
52
139

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
94%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
59%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison