18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Number of tests
4
49
28
23
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#1
Average position
3.3
3.2
2.3
3.3
Latest test
2026
2024
2026
2025
Available sizes
40
213
67
176

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Dry performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Dry driving behavior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
76%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Dry steering response
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Interior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Fuel efficiency
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison