18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs. Nokian Powerproof vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

In this text, we will compare two highly-rated summer tyres - the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 and the Nokian Powerproof. Both tyres come from well-known manufacturers, GoodYear and Nokian, and are designed to provide excellent performance on various surfaces.


The GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is a successor to the popular Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 and has been replaced by the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6. Our rating for this tyre is 94%, meaning it is one of the top choices for summer tyres. This tyre is mostly produced in Slovenia and Germany.


On the other hand, the Nokian Powerproof is a Finnish-made tyre with an 85% rating, demonstrating a strong performance as a summer tyre. Unlike the GoodYear model, there is no newer tyre that has replaced it.


In various tests conducted by leading auto magazines, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 consistently ranked higher than the Nokian Powerproof. Here is a summary of their positions in mutual tests:



  • Autozeitung: GoodYear (1st place, 10 tyres tested) | Nokian (6th place)

  • AutoMotorSport: GoodYear (1st place, 11 tyres tested) | Nokian (7th place)

  • Autobild: GoodYear (2nd place, 11 tyres tested) | Nokian (7th place)

  • ADAC: GoodYear (3rd place, 16 tyres tested) | Nokian (11th place)

  • Gute-Fahrt: GoodYear (2nd place, 10 tyres tested) | Nokian (4th place)

  • Autobild (2nd test): GoodYear (1st place, 10 tyres tested) | Nokian (4th place)


Highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each tyre:


GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5:


  • Strengths: Excellent aquaplaning resistance, wet braking performance, dry braking, dry steering response, exterior noise, comfort, wet handling, price-value, mileage, grass traction, and wet circle cornering.

  • Weaknesses: No specific weaknesses were reported in the tests.


Nokian Powerproof:


  • Strengths: Wet braking, noise, interior noise, handling on gravel, and wet handling.

  • Weaknesses: Lower overall ranking in tests, indicating weaker performance in some areas compared to the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5.


In conclusion, based on test results and expert opinions, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 outperforms the Nokian Powerproof in most categories and across different tests. With its higher overall rating of 94% and consistently higher rankings in mutual tests, the GoodYear tyre is an excellent choice for a summer tyre that provides outstanding performance in various conditions.

Test Profile

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Nokian
Powerproof
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
15
11
6
5
Best position
#1
#2
#3
#1
Average position
2.3
7.5
4.7
2.2
Latest test
2022
2022
2026
2025
Available sizes
187
53
146
63

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
90%
Nokian Powerproof
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
86%
Nokian Powerproof
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88%
Nokian Powerproof
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
90%
Nokian Powerproof
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet handling
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
92%
Nokian Powerproof
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88%
Nokian Powerproof
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet side guide
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
85%
Nokian Powerproof
79%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88%
Nokian Powerproof
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
90%
Nokian Powerproof
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
90%
Nokian Powerproof
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
94%
Nokian Powerproof
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%

Offroad

Offroad
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
92%
Nokian Powerproof
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Gravel traction
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
93%
Nokian Powerproof
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Mud traction
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
86%
Nokian Powerproof
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
76%
Sand traction
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88%
Nokian Powerproof
93%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
80%
Grass traction
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
100%
Nokian Powerproof
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Handling on gravel
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
93%
Nokian Powerproof
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
76%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
76%
Nokian Powerproof
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
75%
Nokian Powerproof
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
80%
Nokian Powerproof
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
77%
Nokian Powerproof
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
66%
Nokian Powerproof
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
94%
Nokian Powerproof
54%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Price/value
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
76%
Nokian Powerproof
50%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison