18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Falken ZIEX ZE320 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Falken
ZIEX ZE320
Kleber
Dynaxer HP5
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
6
3
4
Best position
#3
#7
#2
Average position
6.2
15.0
3.3
Latest test
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
52
356
40

Wet

Wet
Falken ZIEX ZE320
82%
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Falken ZIEX ZE320
86%
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet braking
Falken ZIEX ZE320
72%
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Wet handling
Falken ZIEX ZE320
94%
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
42%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - cross
Falken ZIEX ZE320
74%
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Wet circle cornering
Falken ZIEX ZE320
73%
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Dry

Dry
Falken ZIEX ZE320
87%
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
Falken ZIEX ZE320
91%
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dry handling
Falken ZIEX ZE320
86%
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
46%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Comfort

Comfort
Falken ZIEX ZE320
91%
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Comfort
Falken ZIEX ZE320
76%
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Exterior noise
Falken ZIEX ZE320
85%
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Costs

Costs
Falken ZIEX ZE320
67%
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
Falken ZIEX ZE320
73%
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Mileage
Falken ZIEX ZE320
59%
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison