18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
5
10
4
4
6
5
Best position
#7
#2
#3
#2
#3
#1
Average position
13.0
6.0
12.0
3.3
4.7
2.2
Latest test
2022
2026
2025
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
680
109
111
40
146
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Dry
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Costs
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store