18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
5
10
5
Best position
#7
#2
#1
Average position
13.0
6.0
2.8
Latest test
2022
2026
2026
Available sizes
680
109
139

Wet

Wet
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%

Dry

Dry
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%

Costs

Costs
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison