18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
5
10
1
18
4
Best position
#7
#2
#1
#1
#2
Average position
13.0
6.0
1.0
6.1
3.3
Latest test
2022
2026
2025
2024
2026
Available sizes
680
109
66
47
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Dry
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Interior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Costs
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store