18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
5
4
3
24
14
Best position
#7
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
13.0
3.3
3.7
2.7
3.6
Latest test
2022
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
680
40
36
302
194

Wet

Wet
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Wet performance
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Dry

Dry
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Dry driving behavior
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Dry performance
Continental EcoContact 6
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Dry lane changing
Continental EcoContact 6
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Interior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%

Costs

Costs
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Price/value
Continental EcoContact 6
71%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison