18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
5
4
23
28
Best position
#7
#2
#1
#1
Average position
13.0
3.3
6.7
2.3
Latest test
2022
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
680
40
107
67

Wet

Wet
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Wet performance
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%

Dry

Dry
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Dry driving behavior
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Dry performance
Continental EcoContact 6
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry lane changing
Continental EcoContact 6
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Interior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%

Costs

Costs
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Fuel efficiency
Continental EcoContact 6
99%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Price/value
Continental EcoContact 6
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison