18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
5
4
23
14
Best position
#7
#2
#1
#1
Average position
13.0
3.3
6.7
3.6
Latest test
2022
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
680
40
107
194

Wet

Wet
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Wet performance
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Dry

Dry
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Dry driving behavior
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Dry performance
Continental EcoContact 6
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Dry lane changing
Continental EcoContact 6
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Interior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%

Costs

Costs
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Fuel efficiency
Continental EcoContact 6
99%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Price/value
Continental EcoContact 6
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison