18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
5
6
5
4
15
Best position
#7
#3
#1
#2
#2
Average position
13.0
4.7
2.8
3.3
9.0
Latest test
2022
2026
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
680
146
139
40
226

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet performance
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%
Dry
Confidence
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Dry driving behavior
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Dry performance
Continental EcoContact 6
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Comfort
Confidence
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Interior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%
Costs
Confidence
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Fuel efficiency
Continental EcoContact 6
99%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Price/value
Continental EcoContact 6
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store