18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
5
6
18
3
4
1
Best position
#7
#3
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
13.0
4.7
6.1
3.7
3.3
1.0
Latest test
2022
2026
2024
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
680
146
47
36
40
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Dry
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry lane changing
Continental EcoContact 6
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Costs
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store