18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
5
23
3
Best position
#7
#1
#2
Average position
13.0
6.7
3.7
Latest test
2022
2025
2025
Available sizes
680
107
36

Wet

Wet
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Dry

Dry
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry lane changing
Continental EcoContact 6
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%

Costs

Costs
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Price/value
Continental EcoContact 6
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison