14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from USA. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (94%) than BFGoodrich (75%). In this particular case, the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ has a better rating of 90% compared to 81% of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2019 when was the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/60 R16 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the UltraGrip Performance+ were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (83%) of the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ also have B wet ratings. We also know where G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made - Romania/Poland.

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ /90%

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R15 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Premium

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 176

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 23x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 1.

Worst position in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 8.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

Average position in tests

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 3.26

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 2023

Best rating in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

79%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Wet braking

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 75%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 89%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 84%

Wet handling

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 78%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Wet circle cornering

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 79%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Dry

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

76%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Dry braking

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 78%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 74%

Dry handling

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 77%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 66%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 86%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 94%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 86%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 86%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 80%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

84%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 75%

Comfort

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 81%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 72 dB

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

75%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Rolling resistance

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 80%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

Mileage

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

Price/value

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 69%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ C

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

84.3%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 9 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 205/60 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	2	2.1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2.4	2.7
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good	2.4	2.3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,8	25,4
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+	35,5	25,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2-	2	1-	2
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary	2	2	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	1
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good	2	2-	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	1-	2	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	1-
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2+
Show test details

ACE Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	200	67	48	60	18	9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Recommended	194	63	42	60	14	9
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Recommended	193	66	44	53	18	7
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	9,5	8,7	9,9	10	9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Very good	7,0	7,3	9,9	10	8
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good	7,6	7,8	8,4	8	8
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	1-	2+	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2+	2+
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary	2	2+	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-	2
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	1-	2
Show test details

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands