• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Barum Polaris 6 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Barum (73%). In this particular case, the Barum Polaris 6 has a better rating of 83% compared to 81% of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2. The first tyre test of Barum Polaris 6 was done in 2025, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Polaris 6 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 87% of Barum Polaris 6 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has B rating.

# Barum Polaris 6
/83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
/81%

Add to comparison

Barum
BFGoodrich
DimensionsR14 - R20 R14 - R19
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

2

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+2+1–1
Barum Polaris 6
Rating: Good
32–2+2+
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2
Rating: Good
32–12+
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetSnow
Best values in test32.627.1
Barum Polaris 635.128.2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 236.027.3
Show test details