Segment
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle2. Barum Polaris 6 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Barum (73%). In this particular case, the Barum Polaris 6 has a better rating of 83% compared to 81% of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2. The first tyre test of Barum Polaris 6 was done in 2025, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Polaris 6 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 87% of Barum Polaris 6 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has B rating.
| # | Barum Polaris 6
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R14 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle2. Barum Polaris 6 Lowcost
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good2. Barum Polaris 6 Good
2. Barum Polaris 6 Good
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | 1 | |||
| Barum Polaris 6 Rating: Good | 3 | 2– | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 Rating: Good | 3 | 2– | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.1 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 6 | 35.1 | 28.2 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 36.0 | 27.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||