Table of contents:
205/60 R16 Fulda EcoControl HP2 variants
No
No
Fulda EcoControl HP2 is a summer tyre made in total of 30 sizes, ranging from R15 to R15 - this particular dimension is R16, which means it fits to a 16 inch/406.4mm diameter wheel. 205/60 R16 is 20mm wider than the narrowest dimension (185) and 20mm narrower than the widest one (225). This tyre profile of 60 means the sidewall height of the tyre is 60% of the tyre width (205mm), which results in 123mm sidewall height. In 205/60 R16, there are 2 possible speed indexes for Fulda EcoControl HP2 - "H","V", which are good for speeds up to 210, 240 km/h. In 205/60 R16, EcoControl HP2 usually competes against Presto HP2, which is a tyre from Debica with a rating of 70%, compared to 69% of the Fulda in question.
205/60 R16 92 H
B
C
71dB
205/60 R16 92 V
B
C
71dB
Fulda EcoControl HP2 is made in 30 sizes, starting from 185/65 R15 up to 225/50 R18.
Similar tires
Fulda EcoControl HP2 in tyre tests
Relevant tyre tests in same or similiar dimension (205/60 R16)
Autobild Summer tyre test 2024 205/55 R16
good
Ranked #11 of 20
The Fulda EcoControl HP2 secured the 11th position out of 20 competitors, earning a "Good" final rating. This tire distinguished itself with short braking distances on dry surfaces and was notably quiet, contributing to a reduction in exterior noise – a category in which it performed the best. Additionally, its remarkable mileage and economic efficiency were praised. However, its performance was tempered by mediocre lateral grip on dry roads, which restrained its overall ranking. Despite this, the tire's strengths in durability and noise reduction alongside its cost-effectiveness make it a commendable choice.
good
Ranked #11 of 20
The Fulda EcoControl HP2 secured the 11th position out of 20 competitors, earning a "Good" final rating. This tire distinguished itself with short braking distances on dry surfaces and was notably quiet, contributing to a reduction in exterior noise – a category in which it performed the best. Additionally, its remarkable mileage and economic efficiency were praised. However, its performance was tempered by mediocre lateral grip on dry roads, which restrained its overall ranking. Despite this, the tire's strengths in durability and noise reduction alongside its cost-effectiveness make it a commendable choice.
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 | 36,8 | 29,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
ADAC Summer tyre test 2023 205/55 R16
good
Ranked #13 of 50
Securing its position at 13 out of 50 competitors, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 stood out with a final rating of 'Good', reflecting a strong performance in several key aspects. It was recognized for its positive environmental impact, showing commendable results in longevity, wear, and efficiency, which highlights its low fuel consumption and lightweight design. However, the tyre exhibited some limitations, notably a less balanced performance with weaknesses on wet surfaces that influenced its overall safety rating. Despite a satisfactory performance on dry roads, where it demonstrated safety up to a certain extent and a good braking distance, its abilities on wet roads left room for improvement. The tyre showed good resistance to aquaplaning but faced challenges with wet braking and handling, achieving only satisfactory levels in gripping and managing longitudinal and lateral forces. These factors culminated in a mixed overall conclusion on its safety, alongside an admirable environmental profile.
good
Ranked #13 of 50
Securing its position at 13 out of 50 competitors, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 stood out with a final rating of 'Good', reflecting a strong performance in several key aspects. It was recognized for its positive environmental impact, showing commendable results in longevity, wear, and efficiency, which highlights its low fuel consumption and lightweight design. However, the tyre exhibited some limitations, notably a less balanced performance with weaknesses on wet surfaces that influenced its overall safety rating. Despite a satisfactory performance on dry roads, where it demonstrated safety up to a certain extent and a good braking distance, its abilities on wet roads left room for improvement. The tyre showed good resistance to aquaplaning but faced challenges with wet braking and handling, achieving only satisfactory levels in gripping and managing longitudinal and lateral forces. These factors culminated in a mixed overall conclusion on its safety, alongside an admirable environmental profile.
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 | 2,2 | 2,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,4 | 2,7 | 0,6 | |||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 2,7 | 1,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 | 36,0 | 33,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
