Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Upper-middle

Yokohama

BluEarth-XT

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

BluEarth-XT

e.Ziex

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Number of tests

1

3

6

4

Best position

#7

#2

#3

#2

Average position

7.0

3.7

4.7

3.3

Latest test

2025

2026

Available sizes

2

36

146

40

Wet

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

59%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Aquaplaning - cross

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Wet braking

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

62%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

38%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Wet circle cornering

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

77%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Wet handling

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

75%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Costs

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Rolling resistance

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Mileage

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

45%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Comfort

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

82%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Comfort

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

69%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Exterior noise

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

95%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Dry

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

66%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Dry braking

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

64%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Dry handling

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

67%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Tyres for EV cars Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs Uniroyal RainSport 5

Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs Continental UltraContact

Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs Goodyear EAGLE F1 ASYMMETRIC 6

Falken e.Ziex vs Maxxis Premitra AS AP3

Falken e.Ziex vs Falken E.Ziex

Falken e.Ziex vs Continental UltraContact NXT

Falken e.Ziex vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Browse by brand

GT

Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

BluEarth-XT

e.Ziex

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison