18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

The tyres we will be comparing today are the Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 and the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125. These two models are brought to us by well-established manufacturers, Yokohama and Hankook, respected in the industry for high-quality, reliable tyres.


The Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 is a summer tyre, although it fails to bring a notable rating to highlight its performance. In Autozeitung's comparative test of 20 tyres, this Yokohama model ranked in the 11th place, with its dry steering response being noted as the best feature. However, it fell further behind in the Autobild's ranking, coming in 13th out of 50 tyres.


On the other hand, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 is a summer tyre that carries a strong rating of 75%. This model comes as the first equipment with the Citroën C3 Aircross and is manufactured in Hungary. In contrast to the Yokohama Bluearth AE-50, the Hankook tyre demonstrated strong performances in tests conducted by both Autozeitung and Autobild, ranking 5th and 2nd respectively. The notable features of Hankook's performance included dry braking and dry handling abilities.


Verdict


When looking at the overall comparison, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 stands out as an excellent choice given its outstanding performance in both tests and high user rating. Its strengths lie in its good performance under dry conditions, with excellent dry braking and handling properties. This tyre has also been replaced by the Hankook Ventus Prime 4, an even newer model that promises to maintain the same quality standards.


However, the Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 lags behind in terms of test performance and user rating. The primary strength that stood out in the tests was its dry steering responsiveness, which although is a crucial aspect, might not be enough to compensate for the overall performance. There is no information regarding a replacement for this model, which could be interpreted that this model is seen as fulfilling Yokohama's offering in this range.

Test Profile

Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50
Hankook
Ventus Prime3 K125
Number of tests
6
22
Best position
#6
#1
Average position
11.8
4.9
Latest test
2020
2022
Available sizes
12
161

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
68%
Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
79%
Hankook
Ventus Prime3 K125
Wet Braking
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
53%
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
78%
Wet Circle Cornering
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
90%
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
90%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
60%
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
68%
Aquaplaning Cross
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
70%
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
80%
Dry Performance
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
90%
Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
96%
Hankook
Ventus Prime3 K125
Dry Braking
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
100%
Dry Handling
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
95%
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
95%
Dry Steering Reaction
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
100%
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
93%
Comfort & Noise
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
83%
Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
83%
Hankook
Ventus Prime3 K125
Noise Exterior
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
90%
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
90%
Ride Comfort
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
75%
Economy
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
72%
Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
56%
Hankook
Ventus Prime3 K125
Rolling Resistance
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
72%
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
56%

Performance spider chart

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutozeitungAutozeitung
Summer
2020225/50 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison