18 shops · 56 ·847+ products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Vredestein ULTRAC Premium
VredesteinVredestein

ULTRAC

1.6
R15 – R21
Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
BFGoodrich AdvantageUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
2 mutual test(s) with detailed data
Also compare with
Ventus Evo Cinturato (C3) PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Number of tests
—
10
14
Best position
—
#2
#8
Average position
—
6.0
13.4
Latest test
—
2026
2026
Available sizes
—
109
153

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Confidence
Vredestein ULTRAC
89%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Wet Braking
Vredestein ULTRAC
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet Handling
Vredestein ULTRAC
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Wet Circle Cornering
Vredestein ULTRAC
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Vredestein ULTRAC
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
67%
Aquaplaning Cross
Vredestein ULTRAC
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Dry Performance
Confidence
Vredestein ULTRAC
82%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Dry Braking
Vredestein ULTRAC
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Dry Handling
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Comfort & Noise
Confidence
Vredestein ULTRAC
71%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Noise Exterior
Vredestein ULTRAC
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Ride Comfort
Vredestein ULTRAC
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
86%
Economy
Confidence
Vredestein ULTRAC
47%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Rolling Resistance
Vredestein ULTRAC
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Mileage
Vredestein ULTRAC
35%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
60%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2022215/55 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVsBest dry-handling tyresBest rain tyresBest handling tyresQuietest tyresMost economical tyresBest anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Vredestein ULTRAC vs Continental PremiumContact 7Vredestein ULTRAC vs Vredestein UltracVredestein ULTRAC vs Michelin Primacy 4+Vredestein ULTRAC vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian WetproofBFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Browse by brand

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearNokianFalkenKumhoVredesteinContinentalNexenGTMaxxis

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store