18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac+ vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Test Profile

Vredestein
Ultrac+
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Michelin
e.Primacy
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Number of tests
3
5
4
14
Best position
#10
#1
#3
#2
Average position
10.7
2.8
12.0
5.5
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
79
139
111
700

Wet

Wet
Vredestein Ultrac+
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Wet braking
Vredestein Ultrac+
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Vredestein Ultrac+
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Vredestein Ultrac+
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Wet handling
Vredestein Ultrac+
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%

Dry

Dry
Vredestein Ultrac+
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Dry braking
Vredestein Ultrac+
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%
Dry handling
Vredestein Ultrac+
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Vredestein Ultrac+
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Comfort
Vredestein Ultrac+
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
74%
Exterior noise
Vredestein Ultrac+
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%

Costs

Costs
Vredestein Ultrac+
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Rolling resistance
Vredestein Ultrac+
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
59%
Mileage
Vredestein Ultrac+
58%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison