18 shops · 56 ·847+ products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac+ vs. Falken e.Ziex (2026)

Vredestein Ultrac+Premium
VredesteinVredestein

Ultrac+

6.6
R15 – R20
VS
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

8.9
R15 – R21
Also compare with
Ventus Evo UltraContact NXT Blue Response TG
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Vredestein (62%). In this particular case, the Falken e.Ziex has a better rating of 89% compared to 66% of the Vredestein Ultrac+. The first tyre test of Vredestein Ultrac+ was done in 2026, compared to 2023 when was the Falken e.Ziex first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Automotorsport 2026 195/55 R16 test, where both the Ultrac+ and the e.Ziex were tested.

Test Profile

Vredestein
Ultrac+
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
4
4
Best position
#2
#2
Average position
8.5
3.8
Latest test
2026
2026
Available sizes
87
37

These tyres were not tested together. The comparison below is inferred from separate tests by normalizing both tyres against 10 shared benchmark tyres, so treat it as an estimate.

Dry
Confidence
Vredestein Ultrac+
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry braking
Vredestein Ultrac+
92%
Falken e.Ziex
97%
Dry handling
Vredestein Ultrac+
71%
Falken e.Ziex
92%
Dry handling - objective
Vredestein Ultrac+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
91%
Dry lane changing
Vredestein Ultrac+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry steering response
Vredestein Ultrac+
58%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet
Confidence
Vredestein Ultrac+
94%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Aquaplaning - cross
Vredestein Ultrac+
91%
Falken e.Ziex
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Vredestein Ultrac+
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Wet braking
Vredestein Ultrac+
96%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Wet handling
Vredestein Ultrac+
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet handling - objective
Vredestein Ultrac+
92%
Falken e.Ziex
92%
Wet side guide
Vredestein Ultrac+
92%
Falken e.Ziex
92%
Comfort
Confidence
Vredestein Ultrac+
94%
Falken e.Ziex
91%
Exterior noise
Vredestein Ultrac+
94%
Falken e.Ziex
91%
Costs
Confidence
Vredestein Ultrac+
91%
Falken e.Ziex
96%
Rolling resistance
Vredestein Ultrac+
88%
Falken e.Ziex
97%
Fuel Consumption
Vredestein Ultrac+
93%
Falken e.Ziex
94%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutomotorsportAutomotorsport
Summer
2026195/55 R16View

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVsBest dry-handling tyresBest rain tyresBest handling tyresQuietest tyresMost economical tyresBest anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Vredestein Ultrac+ vs Michelin Primacy 5Vredestein Ultrac+ vs Bridgestone Turanza 6Vredestein Ultrac+ vs Pirelli Cinturato (C3)Vredestein Ultrac+ vs Hankook Ventus EvoFalken e.Ziex vs Firestone Roadhawk 2Falken e.Ziex vs Falken Azenis FK520Falken e.Ziex vs Yokohama BluEarth-XTFalken e.Ziex vs Cooper Summer

Browse by brand

MichelinPirelliHankookGoodyearNokianNexenContinentalVredesteinKumhoFalkenMaxxisDunlop

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.