18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
19
49
3
1
5
Best position
#3
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
11.2
3.2
3.7
1.0
2.2
Latest test
2021
2024
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
76
213
36
66
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet handling
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Wet braking
Uniroyal MS plus 77
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - cross
Uniroyal MS plus 77
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet circle cornering
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Uniroyal MS plus 77
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Snow
Uniroyal MS plus 77
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Snow handling
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Snow traction
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Snow braking
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Snow cornering
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Costs
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Mileage
Uniroyal MS plus 77
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Rolling resistance
Uniroyal MS plus 77
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Price/value
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Comfort
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Interior noise
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Dry
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Ice
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Ice lateral guidance
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Ice braking
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store